--° Loading... Locating...
Pentagon Rebrands Itself Department of War Under Trump Order as Congressional Budget Office Warns of Rising Costs

Pentagon Rebrands Itself Department of War Under Trump Order as Congressional Budget Office Warns of Rising Costs

Center
Listen to this story on our podcast

The Pentagon is going by a different name in public now, and Congress hasn’t voted on it. President Trump signed an executive order authorizing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and other officials to use “Department of War” and “Secretary of War” as secondary titles in public communications and in nonstatutory documents, a rebrand that’s already showing up on nameplates, promotional videos, and press materials even though the department’s actual legal name hasn’t changed.

Why it’s a nickname and not a name change

Only Congress can rename a federal agency, so the executive order stops short of an actual rename and instead directs the department to lean on the older title wherever the law doesn’t require the formal one. Trump has explained the reasoning bluntly, arguing that the US won its major wars under the War Department name before it became the Department of Defense in 1949, and that going back to “war” better reflects what the department is supposed to project. Hegseth has already installed a “Secretary of War” nameplate outside his office and appeared in a promotional video pushing the new branding, though the rollout drew some mockery for how stilted the delivery came across.

The part that costs actual money

The Congressional Budget Office estimates the rebrand will cost taxpayers somewhere between $10 million and $125 million just for the secondary-title rollout, letterhead, signage, uniforms, digital assets, and that figure balloons into the hundreds of millions if Congress ever makes the name change official and the department has to swap out everything that currently says “Defense.” The House has taken a preliminary step toward making the change permanent, but it still needs Senate action to become law.

Common sense says a symbolic rebrand that costs tens of millions of dollars before a single law has changed is worth being honest about on both sides. It’s not free, and it’s not binding either, it’s a branding decision the administration is allowed to make on its own, dressed up as bigger than it currently is.

Sources: TIME · ABC News · Military.com

Written by BeezLoop Editorial Team

The BeezLoop Editorial Team covers politics, world news, sports, business, and culture with an emphasis on independent verification: every fact, quote, and statistic is checked against primary sources before publication.…

More from this author →

BeezLoop News is an independent online news, discussion, opinion, and blog publication. Our articles combine reporting with editorial commentary and analysis. See our editorial standards for how we handle sourcing and corrections.

Advertisement follow us Banner_long_mobile

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Start typing to search

🔔

Stay Updated!

Get instant notifications for breaking news and important stories. We'll keep you informed!

Don't miss a story

Get the day's top headlines delivered to your inbox.