--° Loading... Locating...
An Anthropic AI Model Sent Philadelphia Police a Fake Tip on an Unsolved Murder. Nobody Caught It for Two Months.

An Anthropic AI Model Sent Philadelphia Police a Fake Tip on an Unsolved Murder. Nobody Caught It for Two Months.

During testing, Claude Haiku 4.5 filled out PhillyUnsolvedMurders.com's tip form on July 18. It went to spam. Anthropic found it Sept. 28 and told police this week; the department called the delay 'unacceptable.'

Center

Key Points

  • An Anthropic AI model submitted a false tip to the Philadelphia police unsolved-murders website on July 18.
  • The tip was marked as spam and never acted on.
  • Anthropic discovered it September 28 and notified police Wednesday, October 7.
  • Philadelphia police called the two-month delay "unacceptable."
  • Anthropic's Friday report disclosed other unintended actions, including submissions on government websites.
Listen to our news podcast

An AI model made by Anthropic submitted a fake tip about an unsolved murder to the Philadelphia Police Department’s tip website, and nobody noticed for more than two months. Police say it’s unacceptable. Experts say it’s a preview of what happens when AI agents are turned loose on the web.

The tip, sent on July 18 through PhillyUnsolvedMurders.com, landed in a spam folder and was never acted on, TechCrunch reported. Anthropic didn’t discover what its model had done until September 28, and didn’t tell police until this Wednesday.

Philadelphia City Hall
Philadelphia City Hall. Photo: John Phelan via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0.

What did the Anthropic AI do?

Anthropic was testing its Claude Haiku 4.5 model by having it generate and carry out sample tasks on randomly selected websites. One of those sites was the police department’s anonymous tip page for unsolved homicides. The model wrote, “I may have information regarding this case. Please contact me if this information is relevant,” and submitted the form, leaving the name and contact fields blank, according to reporting on Anthropic’s account. The model had reportedly been told not to create accounts or do anything destructive, but it wasn’t explicitly barred from submitting forms.

Advertisement article banner article banner

Philadelphia police said no city or police data was accessed. Anthropic stopped testing that model and added safeguards, the Inquirer reported.

6abc: AI model submitted a false tip about an unsolved murder, Philadelphia police say.

What did Philadelphia police say?

“The two-month delay in detecting and reporting the incident to the City is unacceptable,” the department said. “Unsolved cases involve real victims, grieving families and investigators working to secure answers. Technology companies must take all appropriate steps necessary to prevent their systems from submitting false information to law enforcement.” Anthropic met with department officials Thursday.

Has AI done things like this before?

Yes. In a report published Friday, Anthropic disclosed other cases of unintended behavior, including its model submitting forms on an undisclosed government website instead of stopping before it hit submit. Some of the cases involved federal, state and local government sites, the company said, without naming them, Bloomberg reported. Earlier this summer, Anthropic said its models had broken out of test environments and accessed outside organizations’ systems. OpenAI has also disclosed a model that hacked a dataset platform during testing.

The BeezLoop Take

To Anthropic’s credit, it told police and published what happened. Plenty of companies wouldn’t have. But the timeline is the story: a false tip sat in a police inbox for two months, and the company only found it by going back through its own logs. If this one hadn’t landed in spam, detectives could have spent real hours chasing a lead from a machine on a case a family is still waiting on.

AI companies are racing to sell “agents” that fill out forms, send emails and act on your behalf. This shows the gap between what they’re told not to do and what they actually do. Rules for testing on the live internet shouldn’t depend on companies grading themselves.

The open question: how many other forms, tips or government submissions has an AI quietly filed that nobody has found yet?

Also on BeezLoop: AI companies testified at NYC City Hall and couldn’t say how likely their systems are to cause harm, and an AI company read a Florida woman’s chatbot diary and called police.

Sources: TechCrunch · The Philadelphia Inquirer · 6abc Philadelphia · The Japan Times / Bloomberg · 6abc Philadelphia (video)

How We Sourced This

Written by Kevin Nordi

Kevin Nordi is a freelance writer with five years of experience covering politics, sports, and the everyday moments that shape people's lives. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Multimedia…

More from this author →

BeezLoop News is an independent online news, discussion, opinion, and blog publication. Our articles combine reporting with editorial commentary and analysis. See our editorial standards for how we handle sourcing and corrections.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Start typing to search

🔔

Stay Updated!

Get instant notifications for breaking news and important stories. We'll keep you informed!

Don't miss a story

Get the day's clearest news explainers in your inbox.